Politics

Political Articles from The Axis Blog
PDF Print E-mail

I Stand Corrected

Written by Administrator   
Tuesday, 01 June 2010 13:38


Sometimes these people really make me scratch my head. Wasn't I just saying that it was unreasonable to criticize the Obama Administration for this Gulf Oil Spill? Apparently, my gesture was unwanted and unneeded. Right on the heels of that, here comes the Obama Admin wanting to take full responsibility.

Excuse me, but have you guys been paying any attention at all over there? You do realize that this is a complete and utter disaster, right President Obama? Why in the heck would someone who has plausible deniability actually want to take credit for this mess? They were on the right track last week when they pointed out that the Feds don't have better equipment or technology than does BP. This is, after all, BP's spill and hence responsibility. It is furthermore their mess to clean up.

Does Obama Hate This Thing Too?

Even Nancy Pelosi gets it. Well, not really, but she understands that it is a bad thing to own this mess. So what does she do? The only thing these guys know how to do. She blames Bush.

“We're talking about eight years of the Bush administration, and many of the people appointed in the Bush administration are still burrowed in the agencies that are supposed to oversee the industry,”

Seriously, Nancy? You can't possibly be that stupid. Sure, there's a lot of evidence against you, but if you were there would be a kid standing beside you with a drool rag at the ready. Yet even this neon sign of intellectual vacancy understands that one doesn't want to be tagged with the blame for this mess. So what in the heck is President Obama thinking here? How can he let Carol Browner run around begging credit for this debacle?

President Obama's director of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy says the White House calls the shots when it comes to the care and clean up of the Gulf oil spill. "Make no mistake about it, the government is in charge. BP comes to the government and gets permission to take the steps they take," Carol Browner told Fox & Friends anchor Steve Doocy during an interview Tuesday.

Well, Mr. President, let me apologize then. You want it? You got it. I stand corrected. I guess the President does hate those fluffy little birds that are getting soaked in oil. I'm sorry that I tried to be reasonable and blame the people actually behind the accident and cleanup process when clearly, Sir, it is all your fault. I now recognize your great wrath at the fishermen in New Orleans, and stand in awe of all you have done to destroy their livelihoods. I would like to complicate the way you were able to see the true evil in the marsh lands and obliterate them with your swift and sure destruction. And what the heck is that creature pictured above? I don't know, but he's ugly, and I want to thank you for your noble attempt at eradicating him and his kind from the planet. This world will be a much better place for all the wonderful things you have accomplished down there in the Gulf of Mexico. Now I still think that it was a bit over the top killing those 11 workers, but hey, who am I to question? I did it once before, and clearly I was wrong. I'm sorry.

Many have criticized the President for his golfing and vacationing during this crisis, but one thing is as clear as the plastic nose on Nancy Pelosi's face. In this White House, stupid never takes a day off.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 01 June 2010 14:24
 
 
PDF Print E-mail

Obama Admin Falls Victim To Itself

Written by Administrator   
Tuesday, 25 May 2010 05:50

Does Obama Hate Birds?
When Katrina hit the Gulf Coast, peope like myself (and by that I mean rational people) were unprepared for the fallout that would hit the Bush Administration. You see, some people are aware of the fact that some things are out of the control of humans, no matter how much power an individual possesses. Global warming paranoia aside, storms are acts of nature, not man made events. Yet liberals seized on the opportunity to blame the Bush Administration for the storm itself and the ensuing disaster in the New Orleans area.

Last Updated on Sunday, 30 May 2010 20:45
 
PDF Print E-mail

Obama Considers Bypassing Miranda Rule

Written by Administrator   
Monday, 10 May 2010 21:39

Eric Holder
It's amazing what having 3 terrorist attacks in a year and a half will do to a President, isn't it? BTW, whatever happened to those liberals who said that the Bush Administration was exaggerating threats of terror? Remember Al Gore? "He betrayed this country! He played on our fears!" Ah, yes. The good old days when we were deceived by our Government into thinking that enhanced interrogation techniques and a strong military was a better defense than reducing missile stockpiles and world apology tours. Yet how do we go from informing enemy combatants picked up on the battlefield that they have the right to remain silent to this?

 

Last Updated on Sunday, 30 May 2010 13:37
 
 
PDF Print E-mail

Crist vs Rubio

Written by Administrator   
Saturday, 03 April 2010 21:06

MwahBama
Florida Governor Charlie Crist and former State Speaker of The House Marco Rubio faced off in a debate on Fox News Sunday.

I just wanted to cover a few of the highlights of the debate to show why The Axis of Stevil Show is pulling for Marco Rubio to be the next Senator of the State of Florida.

 

Last Updated on Sunday, 30 May 2010 13:21
 
PDF Print E-mail

The New Cost Of H.C.R.

Written by Administrator   
Monday, 29 March 2010 19:06

AT&T

 AT&T Inc. will book $1 billion in first-quarter costs related to the health care law signed this week by President Obama, the most of any US company so far.

A change in the tax treatment of Medicare subsidies triggered the noncash expense, and the company will consider changes to the benefits it offers current and retired workers, AT&T said yesterday in a regulatory filing.

John Deere

 John Deere & Co. said Thursday the health-care reform act signed into law this week will cost the company an extra $150 million this year.

The bulk of the costs will come in the second quarter, Deere said.  The amount was not included in the company's 2010 guidance issued earlier this year that called for net revenue of $1.3billion.

Caterpillar

And late yesterday, Caterpillar estimated it will incur expenses of $100 million after taxes.

3M

NEW YORK, March 26 (Reuters) - 3M Co will record a one-time non-cash charge of up to $90 million, or 12 cents a share, in the first quarter as a result of the U.S. health reform signed into law this week, the company said on Friday.

Verizon

This week, Verizon Communications Inc. sent a letter to employees suggesting that changes to their health plans could be afoot. AT&T and Verizon are the two largest phone companies in the U.S. and employ a substantial number of unionized workers.

Several million retirees are estimated to receive drug benefits from a few thousand companies. If those retirees were shifted to the federal Medicare program, the government would pick up the expense. It is unclear whether savings from the elimination of the subsidy would offset those higher Medicare costs.

Bush Obama Poll Numbers

So, what is the White House reaction to all of this? They chose to try to intimidate and muzzle those who come out and state their losses. But perhaps one of the most stunning things about this is an account from a lobbyist who sat down with President Obama to explain these losses.

"Most of these people [in the Administration] have never had a real job in their lives. They don't understand a thing about business, and that includes the President," says a senior lobbyist for one of the companies that announced the charge. "My CEO sat with the President over lunch with two other CEOs, and each of them tried to explain to the President what this bill would do to our companies and the economy in general. First the President didn't understand what they were talking about. Then he basically told my boss he was lying. Frankly my boss was embarrassed for him; he clearly had not been briefed and didn't know what was in the bill."

This won't surprise those who have followed Obama, and realize that the man has never run so much as a lemonade stand.  His ObamaBot followers, of course, will be shocked by such a report if they even decide to read it. This, of course, would be followed by denial. But here is a fact. While the White House attacks companies for coming out and stating what their losses are based on this new law, they are ignoring the fact that they are legally required to do so.

 

Perhaps that explains why the Administration is now so touchy. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke took to the White House blog to write that while ObamaCare is great for business, "In the last few days, though, we have seen a couple of companies imply that reform will raise costs for them." In a Thursday interview on CNBC, Mr. Locke said "for them to come out, I think is premature and irresponsible."

Meanwhile, Henry Waxman and House Democrats announced yesterday that they will haul these companies in for an April 21 hearing because their judgment "appears to conflict with independent analyses, which show that the new law will expand coverage and bring down costs."

In other words, shoot the messenger. Black-letter financial accounting rules require that corporations immediately restate their earnings to reflect the present value of their long-term health liabilities, including a higher tax burden. Should these companies have played chicken with the Securities and Exchange Commission to avoid this politically inconvenient reality? Democrats don't like what their bill is doing in the real world, so they now want to intimidate CEOs into keeping quiet.

Either way, the Obama War On Wealth continues in full swing. Ironically, destroying jobs, wealth, and the economy seems to be the only thing that this man is capable of.

Last Updated on Monday, 29 March 2010 19:06
 
 

Page 1 of 21

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
Internet Radio at it's best, it's The Axis Of Stevil Show on Blog Talk Radio

Search

My Menu

? Axis Answers ?

There are no new open questions

Express Yourself

Which politician would you least like to face off with in a naked shower confrontation?
 

Axis Answers UCP

Online Users

0 users and 22 guests online

Member Search

I am looking for
Age between
to
Location :
City
State
Country