The Axis of Stevil Show. Your world, my spin.

Equal

More specifically, equal opportunity. Creation Date Thursday, 03 May 2012. Hits 1521

Equal

Equal is a simple word. Chances are, you are very familiar with it. You probably use it on a regular basis. If you are a student, you may often use the word when verbalizing a math problem. If you are an expert in your field, perhaps you remind people from time to time that they are not your equal. If you are on a diet, you may even put some of it in your coffee, but that is a topic for a different discussion. If you are a liberal, you have no earthly idea as to the real meaning of the word. You think you do, but you have screwed this word up so badly that there is no possible way that you could understand it. That's why it has become the first entry into our Liberal Lexicon. Equal. Dictionary dot com describes it as follows.

1.
as great as; the same as (often followed by to  or with ): The velocity of sound is not equal to that of light.
2.
like or alike in quantity, degree, value, etc.; of the same rank, ability, merit, etc.: two students of equal brilliance.
3.
evenly proportioned or balanced: an equal contest.
4.
uniform in operation or effect: equal laws.
5.
adequate or sufficient in quantity or degree: The supply is equal to the demand.

Now at this point, most liberals are saying "See? I knew that." No, you didn't. And I can prove it.

Any time a government entity is seeking to hire people and they advertise the positions on radio or television, they run a legal disclaimer at the end that goes something like this. "The United States Postal Service is an Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action Employer. Women and Minorities are encouraged to apply."

So, what is an equal opportunity employer? "Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the first federal law designed to protect most U.S. employees from employment discrimination based upon that employee's (or applicant's) race, color, religion, sex, or national origin." And what is an Affirmative Action Employer? "Affirmative action refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation or national origin" into consideration in order to benefit an underrepresented group "in areas of employment, education, and business", usually justified as countering the effects of a history of discrimination."

Now I ask you, is it possible to simultaneously protect against discrimination based on race  and enforce hiring to benefit based on race? Absolutely not. If two applicants are equal, yet one is chosen over another because they belong to an "underrepresented group", then by definition the other candidate was discriminated against based on race.

So since we have established that liberals do not mean equal when they say equal, we now have to define what they actually mean. I hereby present you with that definition.

Equal

1. Similar enough to get it passed, and different enough to appease your base. (3.5 gpa plus minority status is equal to 4.0 and white)

2. The same as only in cases where two or more minority statuses appear in the form of one individual person. (hiring a black woman is equal to hiring 2 black men)

Comments (2)

  • Bill Baxter

    Bill Baxter

    • 12 March 2017 at 19:40
    • #

    I consider myself to be a liberal, progressive independent and I take equal to be just that, a mathematical concept. In reality there is no equality, only equivalents and approximations. You try to pick the best tool for the job but we are quirky and illogical and often make a mess of things. Sometimes we try to fix things like real past and present injustices. One persons justice is another's shit sandwich.

    reply

  • Bill Baxter

    Bill Baxter

    • 12 March 2017 at 19:43
    • #

    And you can define that shit sandwich however but,,,,,

    reply

Leave a comment

You are commenting as guest. Optional login below.

Hot off the press.

More From The Axis

  • Watered Down Travel Ban

    Watered Down Travel Ban

    I have some friends and family who supported President Trump from early on in the process. From time to time they will ask me when I will admit that I was wrong about him. "If Trump does x... If Trump gets y... If Trump supports a policy that results in z... will you admit that you were wrong?" My answer is always "no", because I wasn't wrong. To be clear, I could be wrong in practical application, but that isn't what an election is about. Elections are about theory and speculation and, generally speaking about judging records. Trump had no record to speak of, and his history of stances on issues was all over the map. I opposed his candidacy for several major reasons, all of which are proven valid in this single issue we now refer to as the "travel ban". Here were my reasons.

    Continue reading
  • Fraudulent Rant by Judge Jeanine

    Fraudulent Rant by Judge Jeanine

    If you're not familiar with Justice with Judge Jeanine, it is a show on the FOX News Network starring Jeanine Pirro. She is known for her over-the-top rants where she serves up gobs of fresh red meat for her largely hard right wing audience. While it's not unusual for her to be a little fast and loose with the facts, she has been known to occasionally return from the break with a correction from her producers. Last night, however, there was no such correction to an outright lie she told on the show, and the matter being discussed should have (at the very least) contained a disclaimer from the host. I would cut her some slack, but as a former prosecutor and judge, she should be well aware of what proper protocol should have been here.

    Continue reading
  • Wake The Hell Up, GOP!

    Wake The Hell Up, GOP!

    It's not cute anymore, Republicans. The President of the United States is completely detached from reality, and you can't fix that. You can't cover it up, you can't explain it away, and let me make this as clear as I possibly can for you. You cannot possibly undo the damage you are doing to the party brand by trying to pretend this man is anything other than completely unhinged. I'm watching Sean Hannity borrow guests from the Alex Jones show in an attempt to bolster Trump's conspiratorial claims. I'm seeing relatively mainstream conservatives make themselves look like the crazed fringes of the paranoid right wing. Don't believe me? Look at this.

    Continue reading

Articles © The Axis of Stevil Show 2009-2017